Transforming Community Safety in Minneapolis survey

Transforming Community Safety in Minneapolis

Question Title

The purpose of this survey is for members of the Minneapolis community to identify what safety looks like, and to provide ideas for how a new model can be accomplished. Results from this survey will be used to help create recommendations for elected leaders. This will also be used to help guide our next steps in our community engagement.

Some of the questions may bring up sensitive topics. You can skip any question that you would like to skip or stop the survey at any time. You can find some information from the City about mental, emotional, spiritual and physical wellbeing here.

Your privacy is important to us. What you provide in this survey will be shared with City of Minneapolis employees who are working on this engagement. You are not required to take this survey. You will not be asked for your name. No consequences will be taken against you if you choose not to take the survey or leave the survey while in progress.

This survey will take approximately 15 minutes.

For reasonable accommodations or alternative formats please contact or 612-673-2301. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can use a relay service to call 311 at 612-673-3000. TTY users call 612-263-6850.

Para asistencia, llame al 612-673-2700 - Rau kev pab 612-673-2800 - Hadii aad Caawimaad u baahantahay 612-673-3500.

After reading the information above, are you willing to take the survey? Yes No

Powered by SurveyMonkey See how easy it is to create a survey. Privacy & Cookie Policy

Transforming Community Safety in Minneapolis With this survey we want to better learn how people in Minneapolis feel about transforming community safety. We also want to gather specific feedback on how to transform community safety. In these first two questions, we want to know generally about your hopes and concerns about transforming community safety.

Question Title 2. When you think about transforming community safety, what are your hopes?

I hope for a city where no one is physically harmed or coerced,

I hope for a city where everyone has their needs met.

I hope for a city where no one is so much as hassled for doing something that is not harming someone else, whether that is living outdoors or using drugs or walking across a street or doing sex work or driving while Black.

I hope for a city where policing plays no role.

Question Title 3. When you think about transforming community safety, what are your concerns?

I am concerned that people will continue to fail to have the courage to get rid of what is not working for us.

I am concerned that we will not be willing to accept that justice will cost more resources than the repression in place now, that people’s demands for housing, for food, for jobs will be taken as a reason to police and control people, rather than meet these needs.

I am concerned that the requirement to decriminalize activity, the criminalization of which forces to resolve disputes without help of societal structures, will not be met.

I am concerned that programs that need to be wholly independent of policing to succeed, such as violence interrupters, alternative dispute resolution, and restorative justice will become complicit in police (and police violence) and so lose their independence and credibility.

You selected “Alternatives to policing”. Please explain any specific programs, strategies, or suggestions for how to approach alternatives to policing in Minneapolis.

Redistribute wealth

Abolition has always been tied to economic justice. Intertwined with white supremacy, inequality is one of the root causes of the problem of policing.

Even aside from the ‘protection of property’ basis for policing, aside from the injustice of arresting people who shoplift and not people who underpay wages, there’s another question: why do people from one population shoplift (for survival, not for fun, as the latter transcends classes and groups) while people from another population commit wage theft?

We all know this is a matter of wealth inequality.

Even though economic injustice is global and nations hold most geopolitical power, Minneapolis can take significant steps to address the unequal and unfair distribution of wealth that is a key driver of racial inequalities.

A resident dividend (payments to every person living in Minneapolis) funded by increased property taxes would leave most property owners paying a net lower tax rate (with the increased taxes more than offset by the dividend). Houseless people and renters, meanwhile, would receive money that can be put toward housing. At the same time it would make it economically unfeasible for anyone, especially non-resident/corporate owners, to leave properties empty and unused.

Support what’s already working

Women’s shelters, substance abuse programs, youth enrichment and employment programs, mentorship, and so much more, should find their work much easier with everything else the city starts doing for its residents. Nevertheless, Minneapolis should be sure to continue and expand support for anything with evidence that it’s working.

You selected “Public health based violence prevention solutions”. Please explain any specific programs, strategies, or suggestions for how to approach public health based solutions for violence prevention in Minneapolis.

Neighborhood connectors

Another form of prevention, organizers or coordinators who are paid to simply know their neighborhoods, and connect people to resources formal and informal.

No harm, no crime

Make clear in policy (and update local ordinances accordingly) that there will be no restriction or imposed cost on acts which do not coercively harm others.

Most obviously this brings interactions between consenting adults, including selling drugs and sex work, into the realm of using the same dispute resolution practices that are (or will be made) available to everyone.

Restorative justice and community accountability

Policing has failed people facing intimate partner violence so thoroughly it is where some of the most thought and work has gone into alternatives:

Our communities’ capacity for restorative justice must be sown and grown to replace prosecuting people as criminals.

Free therapy

If we’re all going to be more able to help people with their own mental wellness challenges, we’re all going to need therapy.

Mental Health Minnesota’s “warmline” may be a model to adopt/expand.

Guaranteed jobs

For people aged 16 to 30, the City of Minneapolis should guarantee a job for anyone who wants to work.

The city should borrow massively at close to zero percent interest to invest in public works, including along the lines of the Green New Deal, as part of the way of fulfilling this jobs guarantee.

You selected “Police reform/policy change”. Please explain any specific programs, strategies, or suggestions for how to approach police reform/policy change in Minneapolis.

Pay reparations

Black and indigenous people in Minneapolis (as everywhere in the US) are owed reparations for harassment and physical harm by police, for past and ongoing discrimination, for slavery and genocide.

There are models for doing this locally, chiefly Chicago. (See How Chicago became the first city to make reparations to victims of police violence and Slavery reparations seem impossible but in many places they’re already happening )

For one option in Minneapolis, city land (and land abandoned by out-of-town owners because of the property taxes funding the resident dividend) could be turned over to a Black and indigenous-led cooperative land trust.

Universal basic income

Money doesn’t solve all problems, but that’s no excuse for not giving enough money to people to solve what problems it can.

The modest wealth redistribution of a resident dividend can also be considered to serve part of this purpose, as it can and should be paid out at least quarterly.

But Minneapolis should further raise what it can towards a weekly or monthly guaranteed minimum income.

An excellent source of revenue for that is charging people for the harm their pollution causes.

Minneapolis could impose a fee for all potential waste coming into the city, literally everything from natural gas to be burnt to soda cans. Similar to how some states have bottle bills, people get a refund for turning things in, but for anything that is littered and lost or wasted or used up the paid-in money is distributed to everyone equally.

You selected “other”. Please explain, and provide any specific programs, strategies, or suggestions.

Community security

Different people trained to respond to intervene in different situations of crisis.

Different crisis call for different responses. You’ve already started to identify this in the analysis of calls to 911, but lets not forget how rarely many people call 911 at all. There’s lots of situations, such as the majority of domestic violence, that aren’t reflected in current data.

Crisis situations can be handled in part with a central number dispatching the relevant professionals for mental health emergencies, interpersonal disputes, physical altercations, injuries, etc. These professionals would be drawn from or at least required to live in the immediate neighborhoods they serve, allowing both rapid response and an increased chance of cultural awareness and knowledge of particular people.

This must be supplemented by broad training in the community so we can all help each other with first aid, peer therapy, and the like.

If we have a generic all-purpose first responder, they will not have a gun, and de-escalation and first aid will be the main training.

Much like a having a standing army leads to its use and abuse, at home as well as abroad, we cannot repeat the mistake of having even a small full-time armed force in our city. For the relatively rare occasions when physical intervention is needed to stop someone in the act of doing harm, we can turn to people trained and paid to be on call. But people with physical intervention training (weapons-trained or not) will neven be on a full time patrol, as that leads to viewing every person they interact with as a potential threat.

Above all, there can be no special rules that apply to people in the role of protector. We can never again be in a situation where the person with their knee on someone’s throat is “doing their job” and someone rushing in to stop this harm could be killed or arrested for assaulting an officer.

The law must apply equally to all.

Paying for neighborhood connectors, community security, community accountability facilitators, free therapy, guaranteed jobs, and other social supports

How to pay for for all this? Having the entire police budget will help a lot, but continually re-creating a wonderful city that has all its key needs met should not be done on the cheap.

A community currency to supplement taxation can help the critical need of paying people for helping their fellow city residents. Indeed, Minneapolis could have its first income tax, steeply progressive but payable solely in our own city-issued currency, to kickstart demand for the alternative currency money we can in part use to pay people for all this local work— there’s no need for anyone to fight for mal-distributed US dollars to pay for local needs.

Continuing the visioning and learning process

We’ll need to deepen our democracy to succeed. In the immediate term we need to publicly collect people’s visions and collectively work on organizing these resources for our near-term abolitionist future.

Agaric technology cooperative can help with collaborative and transparent brainstorming, decision-making, and knowledge-building software for this.

Transforming Community Safety in Minneapolis

We thank you for your input on such a sensitive and important topic. We hope that you will continue to follow the process and take part in future engagement opportunities. You can stay updated about future ways to provide input here.

If you have questions or concerns about this engagement process, you can reach out to or 612-673-2301.